Comment Re: Why? (Score 2) 79
"Computer, start car and drive me to work"
Yes, right after you watch these unskippable ads.
"Computer, start car and drive me to work"
Yes, right after you watch these unskippable ads.
And by and large researchers stopped asking that question, and I think that's probably a smart choice.
It is a choice alright, but to know if it is a smart choice you have to ask the right questions.
Really, the only time you (and others pushing that line) have ever cared about whether a tax is regressive is when it's an argument to not tax fossil fuels.
I am glad we have an expert on what I believe to clear the record.
For the record, I don't believe in intentionally creating or worsening poverty by any means, and that is includes taxation.
Yep, a combination of people who are leaving a place that becomes uninhabitable, and those who are starving because their region has become incapable of producing food
A lot of places already import most of the food. What about people that are starving because fertilizer cost increases due to carbon taxes resulted in more expensive food costs? I read somewhere, I think UN, that today there is no starvation due to food shortage, the only famines are due to inability to afford food or malice (e.g., blocking of imports by warlords).
You'll be hard pressed to find historical records
Landnamabok (9th century) describes forests in Greenland, Landnama (12th century) mentions these forests in the past tense. My understanding that Greenland deforestation was the result of sheep grazing that viking settlers introduced to the area. That is, we don't even have to go to Iron Age to have a multi-source record of forests in Greenland.
1 Mole = 25 Cagey Bees