Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Trump hosts AI CEOs about safety standards and renames AI "super-intelligence"

hcs_$reboot writes: Trump hosted the CEOs of OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, Nvidia and other tech companies at the White House. They agreed to voluntary AI-safety standards, including independent audits and safeguards against AI systems accessing or hacking technical systems in unintended ways. Trump also strongly backed continued rapid expansion of AI data centers, despite concerns over their electricity use and impact on local communities. He said he may create a 10-member board to oversee AI safety and plans to appoint a new White House AI-policy official.

The meeting comes amid growing concerns about AI agents behaving unpredictably and public pressure for stronger safeguards. A Reuters/Ipsos poll cited by Reuters found 73% of Americans felt AI companies had not done enough to prevent serious harm.
During the meeting, Trump also said he prefers to call AI “super-intelligence” rather than artificial intelligence.

Comment Re:Trump isn't wrong about one thing (Score 1) 260

This technology will be as critical as the race for the Nuclear Bomb was back during World War II.

Yes, certainly; no one doubts that. The difference is that in 1945, physicists were, broadly speaking, building a bomb based on a complex formula, and they controlled its detonation. The bomb was powerful and difficult to build, but it remained inert as long as nobody triggered it.

From the very beginnings of LLMs (see Wolfram’s article in particular), mathematicians were already being outstripped by the capabilities of these models. Yes, the results made sense as a consequence of how the system had been programmed, but they were far more sophisticated and relevant than anyone had expected. Faced with the billions upon billions of combinations produced by the ultra-complex networks automatically constructed during training, the quality of these results was, even then, inexplicable.

That’s the difference: with the bomb, we built an object; with AI, we are building intelligence. And that intelligence, which is increasingly surpassing us, is also becoming increasingly difficult to control.

Comment Circus (Score 5, Insightful) 260

The problem isn't what he says, but the fact that he is taken seriously despite what he says.
But unfortunately, because of his position as a state actor, what he says can only be taken seriously.
History will judge those hypocrites who failed to dare to react courageously in the face of this circus.

Comment "Overreliance on Palantir AI" (Score 1) 285

And?
They are no less responsible. Entrusting a deadly war to an AI is reckless and irresponsible.
Hiding behind “it wasn’t us, it was the AI” afterward is pure cowardice and a shocking lack of empathy that deserves to be prosecuted.

Comment Another good reason (Score 1) 151

https://www.youtube.com/watch?... VLC users began reporting massive loading slowdowns (taking up to 30+ seconds to open audio files) following a recent Windows update.
Cause: Investigations from VLC devs revealed the issue wasn't a VLC bug, but Windows Defender scanning/quarantining the application's plugin cache.

Comment NPT (Score 2) 27

Japan building its own nuclear weapons would be a much bigger step than people often assume. It would likely require withdrawing from the NPT and would trigger major diplomatic and economic consequences.
The more realistic discussion is about strengthening deterrence through the US alliance, including the possible return of US nuclear assets to Japan (yes, return: because Japan has hosted US nuclear weapons in the past, particularly during the cold war).

Slashdot Top Deals

"Laugh while you can, monkey-boy." -- Dr. Emilio Lizardo

Working...