Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - US Military Disables Ad Trackers on Devices to Protect Troops (reuters.com) 1

DeanonymizedCoward writes: Reuters reports that the US Military is disabling ad tracking on devices, to prevent adversaries from buying publicly-available tracking data to assist in targeting troops. Military officials say that they have disabled trackers on a variety of computers and mobile devices, according to letters released on Friday by Sen. Ron Wyden, and following reports that commercially-available tracking data has been used to target troops in the Middle East.

This effort comes amid attempts by the military to impose tighter restrictions on use of personal devices in the field, and after it was reported that videos posted publicly by troops abroad have also been used by adversaries to target military facilities.

Wyden said in a statement that it was clear that the military's efforts "have not been effective at neutralizing this threat." U.S. Representative Pat Harrigan, a North Carolina Republican, said that U.S. enemies "should not be able to pull out a credit card and buy information that helps them track American troops."

Rep. Harrigan remains silent as to the larger question of whether the general public should be able to pull out a credit card and buy information that helps them track anyone they please.

Comment Re: humble opinion (Score 1) 61

Probably some combination of "they don't want to clutter the UI with options and data most users don't care about" and "they don't want you to see the amount of system resources consumed by telemetry, advertising, 'on-device AI,' and other shit you didn't ask for."

That said, I don't really see this particular change as "pushing AI" on anyone -- just an evolution in the types of hardware and workloads commonly encountered, with a corresponding evolution in tooling.

Comment Re: Screw the jellyfish, tell me about the racoon! (Score 1) 27

Unfortunately for the Raccoon Mafia's XP score, it looks like this is a relatively small town utility counting individual customers as separate outages.

I had seven power outages in my living room the other day when I tried to run the air conditioner and the iron at the same time.

Comment Re: Retention Periods? (Score 1) 33

We're sorry, but we are unable to answer any questions about the searches you asked about. All data and metadata pertaining to those searches has been deleted in keeping with our terms of service, and now exists only in hardcopy form in Officer Manley's stalker binder. We wish we could be more helpful.

Comment Re:They will just take over the state governments (Score 1) 132

And then override the locals. Every time they want to do something people don't want that's how they do it. They have a name for it they call it government small enough to drown in a bathtub.

They're reportedly already doing that. The 404 Podcast recently interviewed an ex-Flock employee, who said that some municipal PD had completely bypassed the normal city-council funds approval process and signed the city up for a Flock contract using forfeiture funds.

Guillotines for everyone involved, and laws that all forfeiture funds go directly into a public ledger with absolute transparency on what they're used for. Or just get rid of civil forfeiture as an adjunct to criminal prosecution entirely.

Comment Re:The amount of gold in the cameras (Score 1) 132

Yes, utterly amazing the amount of gold in Flock cameras. Gold contacts on the circuit boards, gold in the sensors, gold everywhere. They need it to make sure the cameras can hold up long-term when exposed to heat, cold, humidity, etc. Probably $30-$50 worth of gold per camera. Only a company completely bankrolled by the modern surveillance-state economy could afford to make such high quality circuit boards and sensors, then just put hundreds of thousands of them on bridges and flimsy poles all over the country.

Comment Re:Meaningless statements? (Score 3, Funny) 219

It's true that automation has a perfect record of not getting drunk

Not so sure about that, my Tesla went through a phase were it would randomly drift over and hug the centerline, then eventually cross over it, wobble around a bit, and lurch suddenly toward the edge -- with the on-screen visualization showing exactly what it was doing. Seems to have been silently fixed a few software updates ago, right around the same time it stopped spamming errors about the left headlight E-Fuse and front radar in the service log. Whatever it was on, I don't want any, but could probably make some good money selling it.

Comment Seems like a job for the OS (Score 1) 31

If this is as widespread as it seems, perhaps the manufacturers should fix the OS to do something about it. Banning "anything that links known SDK x, y or z" is just whack-a-mole.

One simple approach that comes to mind with minimal thought (aside from the obvious "why the fsck does a Pac-Man game need network access at all?") is having the app manifest contain a list of domains to which the app intends to connect, and block anything else at the OS level -- perhaps blocking everything by default, then permitting IPs when the app uses the system resolver to resolve a whitelisted name. Then scale the degree of (human and automated) scrutiny applied to the app with the size and breadth of the whitelist. You can still make a web browser app or something that gets unrestricted access, but it gets a lot of eyes on it. Maybe have to provide source for review. For most apps, "you get five connect() calls per minute unless your manifest declares a good reason for more" might be helpful as well.

Perfect? No, but it increases the complexity and expense of automated spamming/DoS/scraping attacks without proportionally increasing the cost of legitimate behavior (even undesirable legitimate behavior like ads), and funnels potential malfeasance through smaller and more observable chokepoints. Get caught serving a million subdomains to route spam traffic via your one whitelisted domain? Congrats, your dev certificate is now revoked and none of your apps work anymore, and anyone who paid for them gets automatic refunds.

Comment No one elected you, period (Score 4, Insightful) 100

Langley, Flock's chief, has dismissed pushes by activists for the company to further limit how officers use its product. "No one elected me the police chief of America," he told Forbes last year

Yeah, no one elected you as much of anything, so kindly take your cameras and fuck off.

Comment Re: If he is found guilty (Score 1) 182

Unfortunately, if he ISN'T convicted, it will likely be due to the ineptitude and buffoonery of the present administration, not for lack of trying.

This is, after all, the DOJ that failed to convict the guy who threw a sandwich at a uniformed law enforcement officer, on camera, then said "yeah, I threw it."

Comment Re: If he is found guilty (Score 4, Interesting) 182

What if he had just written 1209766 on a post-it note inside of his phone case, completely without context? What if he then refused to provide the pin, the agent saw that note and decided to try it and it nuked the device? I have a feeling that now that the door is open we're going to see all sorts of interesting cases testing the limits of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

Comment Re: Probable reaction (Score 1) 121

Stale ads are easy enough to solve, just engineer the monitor to fail a few months past the warranty period, then the customer buys a new one with new ads. Simple!

And in a world where it's considered acceptable for a $3000 refrigerator to fail after 5 years, after replacing one that ran for 30 years, they might even get away with it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"There is such a fine line between genius and stupidity." - David St. Hubbins, "Spinal Tap"

Working...