How to know someone has done no research at all into the situation. You're just a reflexive US hater.

The entire problem of self-driving technology is edge cases. Every self-driving car can make a great demo video, and that's been true since the 90s.

To compare and see which one is actually better, you need to look at data, and that's something we've had trouble getting from American manufacturers AND Chinese manufacturers. So don't even start saying which one is better.

It may be the primary selling point of AI.

Yeah, AI hallucinates, it gets things wrong; but consider that the majority of people don't know simple statistics. AI will give much better answers than they could have gotten themselves.

Not all reactions to external stimuli are feelings.

You didn't read your own link. When Microsoft (or the users in general) finds out about the vulnerability, that is day 1. Before that is day zero.

If Microsoft found out about the exploit on the third of April, then that was day one.
Then day two was April 4th.
Day three was April 5th.

Etc. you should be able to do this kind of math.

It's almost certain that the "perverse effect" was intentional, and some at Harvard want to pit students against each other as a reflection of real world corporate politics (and government politics).

Next time file the report through a lawyer.

It helps if you contact a lawyer to contact the police instead of contacting them yourself.

Sometimes they do pull people over for tinted windows though, for whatever reason.

Match fixing is a thing but in the major sports, the TV revenue is larger than betting revenue by several orders of magnitude.

If it's regular sports betting, then people aren't winning because of insider information.

Actually 76.5% isn't very good. I expected it to be higher.

Americans on average want increased benefits and lowered taxes.

That may seem like a contradiction, and it is; but anyone who increases taxes or lowers benefits gets voted out of office. Even Trump gave up getting rid of Obamacare.

Note they didn't ask people to stop submitted AI code. They asked people to stop submitting AI slop.

Presumably if the code produced is high quality, they will be willing to accept it.

It's a smart strategy IF you don't mind of your most competent employees leave first. At Facebook with its current strategy they might be ok with that.