Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: We are way past nimby (Score 1) 103

Seems to me the answer to your complaints is that organizations building anything requiring electricity at absurdly high levels (like a datacenter) be required to source their own energy. If that's the the issue, there's the solution...

Just be prepared to see even more massive datacenters to justify the infrastructure cost of self-producing their own electricity...

Comment Simple answer... (Score 1) 103

Nikki Gerber told Cleveland.com. "What it feels like they are doing is just taking advantage of the unzoned rural areas of Ohio, where they can go ahead and put in whatever they want."

Simple answer, zone all the unzoned areas in Ohio! A state-wide, default zoning ordinance shouldn't be that hard - just require approval for any development that creates so many thousands of square feet of impervious ground cover by a local governing board (city, county, state)...

Comment Color me dubious (Score 1) 102

The project could supply up to 20% of the city's electricity and power roughly one million homes throughout the year.

"supply up to 20% of the city's electricity and power roughly one million homes throughout the year."

AND? I really think they mean "or", as in "...could supply up to 20% of the city's electricity OR power roughly one million homes throughout the year."

Comment Re: Hey Canada, here's a hint (Score 1) 102

Selling it to British Columbia or Alberta would be harder at the moment due to the lack of transmission lines as well as transmission losses if there were any.

I'm confused, they can build transmission lines to NY State, but they can't/won't build transmission lines to British Columbia or Alberta?

Your uncertainty about line losses undermines your argument - confusion/ignorance on that basic concept is troubling.

Comment Re:IOUs coming due. (Score 1) 233

Cigarette companies actively mis-informed smokers about the effects of smoking (some even paid doctors to say they were healthy!), if the oil companies lied about the impact using their product had on the environment, they can be sued for lying - they can't be sued for being wrong.

But really, how can anyone alive today think that ICE vehicles don't generate greenhouse gases?

Comment Re:IOUs coming due. (Score -1, Flamebait) 233

It's coming for us and payback is going to be a bitch regardless of whom.

That may be true, but it would be nice if the jackasses most directly responsible for 1) creating the problem and, 2) actively obstructing all attempts to address it, were made to pay more than other folks.

The "jackasses most directly responsible" are the countless millions of car owners burning gasoline and making greenhouse gases - it isn't the oil companies "directly" generating the greenhouse gases, it's the consumer... but we won't outlaw ICE vehicles, we won't stop driving, instead, we'll sue the oil company for selling us the gasoline that we turn into greenhouse gases.

The villain is the driver, but it's easier to sue the supplier.

Slashdot Top Deals

A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard.

Working...